ResourcesMap
CivilizationTrust average

100th century BCE

Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia

Nubian Nile Valley, upstream from Aswan

Listen
Compare
View in the constellation

The Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia was a Middle Palaeolithic complex associated with the Nile Valley and regarded as broadly contemporary with the Aterian of the Sahara. It was characterized by bifacial foliate tools, rare tanged pieces, and dominant Levallois technology. Workshop sites such as Arkin 5 and Arkin 6A preserve multiple stages of foliate manufacture, from roughouts to finished tools and broken pieces.

Territory · Civilization

Continue exploring

Ask Uriti

  • What defines the Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia civilisation?
  • What do we know about Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia from 10 000 av. J.-C. onward?
  • What is the link between Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia and Arkin 6A?
  • About Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia: can you clarify “Aterian-related complex in Nubian Nile Valley”?

The Story

Workshops beside the Nubian Nile

In the Nubian Nile Valley, one Middle Palaeolithic complex is described as contemporary with the Aterian in the Sahara. Its defining elements were bifacial foliate tools and very rare tanged pieces. The classification reflects technological similarities with the Aterian, while the archaeological sequence remains part of a longer Middle Palaeolithic tradition in the Nile Valley.

Levallois technology and typology predominated. At Arkin 5 and Arkin 6A, the evidence came from workshop contexts where foliates were produced. These sites preserve the complete manufacturing sequence, including finished tools, numerous broken pieces, and crude roughouts described as “Sangoan-like.”

The complex also included an occupation assemblage at Khor Musa, site 440, near Wadi Haifa. Its upper horizon contained a bifacial foliate and large numbers of fish bones, contrasting with the lower occupation, whose food waste consisted almost entirely of wild cattle. The difference links technological traditions with changing subsistence settings within the Nile Valley.

Key Points

  • Aterian-related complex in Nubian Nile Valley
  • Bifacial foliates defined the assemblage
  • Levallois technology predominated
  • Arkin sites preserved production stages

Trust

average

This level indicates the accuracy of the dates, locations, and boundaries available in the current corpus.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 1: From the Earliest Times to c.500 BC

A starting point for further exploration—not an exhaustive bibliography.

ResourcesMap
CivilizationTrust average

100th century BCE

Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia

Nubian Nile Valley, upstream from Aswan

Listen
Compare
View in the constellation

The Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia was a Middle Palaeolithic complex associated with the Nile Valley and regarded as broadly contemporary with the Aterian of the Sahara. It was characterized by bifacial foliate tools, rare tanged pieces, and dominant Levallois technology. Workshop sites such as Arkin 5 and Arkin 6A preserve multiple stages of foliate manufacture, from roughouts to finished tools and broken pieces.

Territory · Civilization

Continue exploring

Ask Uriti

  • What defines the Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia civilisation?
  • What do we know about Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia from 10 000 av. J.-C. onward?
  • What is the link between Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia and Arkin 6A?
  • About Aterian-related Middle Palaeolithic of Nubia: can you clarify “Aterian-related complex in Nubian Nile Valley”?

The Story

Workshops beside the Nubian Nile

In the Nubian Nile Valley, one Middle Palaeolithic complex is described as contemporary with the Aterian in the Sahara. Its defining elements were bifacial foliate tools and very rare tanged pieces. The classification reflects technological similarities with the Aterian, while the archaeological sequence remains part of a longer Middle Palaeolithic tradition in the Nile Valley.

Levallois technology and typology predominated. At Arkin 5 and Arkin 6A, the evidence came from workshop contexts where foliates were produced. These sites preserve the complete manufacturing sequence, including finished tools, numerous broken pieces, and crude roughouts described as “Sangoan-like.”

The complex also included an occupation assemblage at Khor Musa, site 440, near Wadi Haifa. Its upper horizon contained a bifacial foliate and large numbers of fish bones, contrasting with the lower occupation, whose food waste consisted almost entirely of wild cattle. The difference links technological traditions with changing subsistence settings within the Nile Valley.

Key Points

  • Aterian-related complex in Nubian Nile Valley
  • Bifacial foliates defined the assemblage
  • Levallois technology predominated
  • Arkin sites preserved production stages

Trust

average

This level indicates the accuracy of the dates, locations, and boundaries available in the current corpus.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 1: From the Earliest Times to c.500 BC

A starting point for further exploration—not an exhaustive bibliography.