ResourcesMap
EventTrust high

6th century BCE

Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC

Kush and the Nile Valley

Listen
Compare
View in the constellation

The Egyptian invasion of Kush in 593 BC was conducted during the third year of King Psamtek II’s reign and reached Napata. Egyptian and foreign troops left graffiti at Abu Simbel and Buhen, while an inscription names Potasimto and Amasis as expedition leaders. The campaign may have damaged Napatan monuments and encouraged a later shift toward Meroe.

Territory · Event

Continue exploring

Ask Uriti

  • What unfolded during Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC?
  • What role does Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC play in the Kush and the Nile Valley region?
  • What is the link between Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC and Potasimto?
  • About Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC: can you clarify “Psamtek II invaded Kush in 593 BC”?

The Story

The Campaign of Psamtek II

In the third year of the Egyptian king Psamtek II, an Egyptian army invaded Kush and advanced as far as Napata. The campaign is also associated with Herodotus’s report that the Egyptians attacked Ethiopia at this time. The expedition therefore appears to have penetrated deeply into the Kushite heartland rather than remaining confined to the northern frontier.

Evidence for the campaign comes from inscriptions and graffiti at Abu Simbel and Buhen. The principal graffito at Abu Simbel names Potasimto as leader of the foreign troops and Amasis as leader of the Egyptian forces, and states that they advanced as far as Kerkis. Kerkis cannot be identified with certainty, although the passage notes a possible association with modern Kurgus upstream from Abu Hamed.

The invasion may have had serious consequences for Napata. Fragments of statues of Napatan rulers were discovered in the temples of Jebel Barkal, with the latest fragment attributed to Aspelta. These remains may indicate that Napata was sacked, but the evidence is presented cautiously and does not establish the event conclusively.

The campaign is also considered a possible reason for the growing importance of Meroe. Moving the main center of the state farther south would have increased military security, although the passage emphasizes that the change from Napata to Meroe was gradual and cannot be dated with certainty.

Key Points

  • Psamtek II invaded Kush in 593 BC
  • The army reached Napata
  • Potasimto and Amasis led contingents
  • Graffiti record the expedition
  • The campaign may have weakened Napata

Trust

high

This level indicates the accuracy of the dates, locations, and boundaries available in the current corpus.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 2: From c.500 BC to AD 1050

A starting point for further exploration—not an exhaustive bibliography.

ResourcesMap
EventTrust high

6th century BCE

Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC

Kush and the Nile Valley

Listen
Compare
View in the constellation

The Egyptian invasion of Kush in 593 BC was conducted during the third year of King Psamtek II’s reign and reached Napata. Egyptian and foreign troops left graffiti at Abu Simbel and Buhen, while an inscription names Potasimto and Amasis as expedition leaders. The campaign may have damaged Napatan monuments and encouraged a later shift toward Meroe.

Territory · Event

Continue exploring

Ask Uriti

  • What unfolded during Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC?
  • What role does Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC play in the Kush and the Nile Valley region?
  • What is the link between Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC and Potasimto?
  • About Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC: can you clarify “Psamtek II invaded Kush in 593 BC”?

The Story

The Campaign of Psamtek II

In the third year of the Egyptian king Psamtek II, an Egyptian army invaded Kush and advanced as far as Napata. The campaign is also associated with Herodotus’s report that the Egyptians attacked Ethiopia at this time. The expedition therefore appears to have penetrated deeply into the Kushite heartland rather than remaining confined to the northern frontier.

Evidence for the campaign comes from inscriptions and graffiti at Abu Simbel and Buhen. The principal graffito at Abu Simbel names Potasimto as leader of the foreign troops and Amasis as leader of the Egyptian forces, and states that they advanced as far as Kerkis. Kerkis cannot be identified with certainty, although the passage notes a possible association with modern Kurgus upstream from Abu Hamed.

The invasion may have had serious consequences for Napata. Fragments of statues of Napatan rulers were discovered in the temples of Jebel Barkal, with the latest fragment attributed to Aspelta. These remains may indicate that Napata was sacked, but the evidence is presented cautiously and does not establish the event conclusively.

The campaign is also considered a possible reason for the growing importance of Meroe. Moving the main center of the state farther south would have increased military security, although the passage emphasizes that the change from Napata to Meroe was gradual and cannot be dated with certainty.

Key Points

  • Psamtek II invaded Kush in 593 BC
  • The army reached Napata
  • Potasimto and Amasis led contingents
  • Graffiti record the expedition
  • The campaign may have weakened Napata

Trust

high

This level indicates the accuracy of the dates, locations, and boundaries available in the current corpus.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 2: From c.500 BC to AD 1050

A starting point for further exploration—not an exhaustive bibliography.

Continue the journey

Related Paths

Other paths related to this story.

  • NapataCity·8th century BCE — 4th century
  • Psamtek IICharacter·6th century BCE — 6th century BCE