11th century – 15th century
Ife, Nigeria
Naturalistic metal sculptures from Ife in Nigeria, traditionally described in the extract as “bronzes,” were examined by spectrographic analysis and found to be made of brass rather than bronze. The example shows how archaeometric identification can revise the material classification of African artefacts and affect interpretations of technological history.
Continue exploring
The Story
Naturalistic Nigerian Ife “bronzes” were examined through spectrographic analysis. The results showed that the objects were not made of bronze, as their conventional designation suggested, but of brass. This distinction is technically significant because the two alloys have different compositions and histories of use.
The example illustrates the limits of visual classification. Copper alloys can resemble one another superficially, yet their elemental composition may carry implications for the chronology and interpretation of an artefact. Scientific analysis therefore becomes a corrective to inherited labels and to conclusions based only on appearance.
The extract places the Ife sculptures within a broader programme of archaeometric research involving ancient bronzes, ceramics, mortars, and pigments. It does not provide a date for the Ife objects or describe their artistic, political, or ritual setting. The historical object identified here is consequently the documented body of Ife metalwork as a material and technological tradition, not a securely dated cultural period.
11th century – 15th century
Ife, Nigeria
Naturalistic metal sculptures from Ife in Nigeria, traditionally described in the extract as “bronzes,” were examined by spectrographic analysis and found to be made of brass rather than bronze. The example shows how archaeometric identification can revise the material classification of African artefacts and affect interpretations of technological history.
Continue exploring
The Story
Naturalistic Nigerian Ife “bronzes” were examined through spectrographic analysis. The results showed that the objects were not made of bronze, as their conventional designation suggested, but of brass. This distinction is technically significant because the two alloys have different compositions and histories of use.
The example illustrates the limits of visual classification. Copper alloys can resemble one another superficially, yet their elemental composition may carry implications for the chronology and interpretation of an artefact. Scientific analysis therefore becomes a corrective to inherited labels and to conclusions based only on appearance.
The extract places the Ife sculptures within a broader programme of archaeometric research involving ancient bronzes, ceramics, mortars, and pigments. It does not provide a date for the Ife objects or describe their artistic, political, or ritual setting. The historical object identified here is consequently the documented body of Ife metalwork as a material and technological tradition, not a securely dated cultural period.