ResourcesMap
EventTrust average

5th century BCE – 5th century BCE

Periplus of Hanno

Atlantic coast of North-West Africa

Listen
Compare
View in the constellation

The Periplus of Hanno is a reported Carthaginian expedition associated with the exploration and possible settlement of Atlantic Morocco and the coast farther south. Its traditional dating places it in the fifth century BC, during Carthage’s period of power, but its authenticity and geographical reliability are strongly disputed. Later scholarship cited in the passage regards much of the surviving text as a Hellenistic literary forgery, especially beyond northern Morocco.

Territory · Event

Continue exploring

Ask Uriti

  • What unfolded during Periplus of Hanno?
  • What role does Periplus of Hanno play in the Atlantic coast of North-West Africa region?
  • What is the link between Periplus of Hanno and Gulf of Gabon?
  • About Periplus of Hanno: can you clarify “Reported Carthaginian Atlantic expedition”?

The Story

A disputed Carthaginian voyage

The Periplus of Hanno presents itself as an account of a Carthaginian expedition undertaken at the height of Carthage’s power. Its stated purposes were to settle the Atlantic coasts of Morocco and to explore the coastline farther south. The survival of an eighteen-paragraph narrative is exceptional in light of the destruction of most Carthaginian writing after the Roman capture of Carthage in 146 BC.

For a long time, commentators accepted the account as authentic and treated its episodes as evidence for Carthaginian maritime activity beyond Morocco. Proposed identifications of the expedition’s landmarks differ sharply: Cary and Warmington associated the fiery mountain called the “Chariot of the Gods” with Mount Kakulima in Guinea and the “Horn of the South” with Sherbro Sound in Sierra Leone, while other scholars placed the mountain at Mount Cameroon and the southern landmark in the Gulf of Gabon.

The passage emphasizes that these interpretations face both navigational and geographical difficulties. Carthaginian sailors would have struggled to return northward against prevailing trade winds, while the text’s descriptions cease to resemble recognizable West African conditions after its opening account of northern Morocco. Henri Tauxier argued that the Periplus was a Hellenistic forgery from the first century BC, and Gabriel Germain likewise judged most of it to be the work of a later and mediocre writer.

Warning

The authenticity, date, and southern geographical identifications of the Periplus remain highly uncertain in this account.

Key Points

  • Reported Carthaginian Atlantic expedition
  • Traditional setting in fifth-century BC Carthage
  • Competing identifications of southern landmarks
  • Authenticity challenged as a Hellenistic forgery

Trust

average

This level indicates the accuracy of the dates, locations, and boundaries available in the current corpus.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 2: From c.500 BC to AD 1050

A starting point for further exploration—not an exhaustive bibliography.

ResourcesMap
EventTrust average

5th century BCE – 5th century BCE

Periplus of Hanno

Atlantic coast of North-West Africa

Listen
Compare
View in the constellation

The Periplus of Hanno is a reported Carthaginian expedition associated with the exploration and possible settlement of Atlantic Morocco and the coast farther south. Its traditional dating places it in the fifth century BC, during Carthage’s period of power, but its authenticity and geographical reliability are strongly disputed. Later scholarship cited in the passage regards much of the surviving text as a Hellenistic literary forgery, especially beyond northern Morocco.

Territory · Event

Continue exploring

Ask Uriti

  • What unfolded during Periplus of Hanno?
  • What role does Periplus of Hanno play in the Atlantic coast of North-West Africa region?
  • What is the link between Periplus of Hanno and Gulf of Gabon?
  • About Periplus of Hanno: can you clarify “Reported Carthaginian Atlantic expedition”?

The Story

A disputed Carthaginian voyage

The Periplus of Hanno presents itself as an account of a Carthaginian expedition undertaken at the height of Carthage’s power. Its stated purposes were to settle the Atlantic coasts of Morocco and to explore the coastline farther south. The survival of an eighteen-paragraph narrative is exceptional in light of the destruction of most Carthaginian writing after the Roman capture of Carthage in 146 BC.

For a long time, commentators accepted the account as authentic and treated its episodes as evidence for Carthaginian maritime activity beyond Morocco. Proposed identifications of the expedition’s landmarks differ sharply: Cary and Warmington associated the fiery mountain called the “Chariot of the Gods” with Mount Kakulima in Guinea and the “Horn of the South” with Sherbro Sound in Sierra Leone, while other scholars placed the mountain at Mount Cameroon and the southern landmark in the Gulf of Gabon.

The passage emphasizes that these interpretations face both navigational and geographical difficulties. Carthaginian sailors would have struggled to return northward against prevailing trade winds, while the text’s descriptions cease to resemble recognizable West African conditions after its opening account of northern Morocco. Henri Tauxier argued that the Periplus was a Hellenistic forgery from the first century BC, and Gabriel Germain likewise judged most of it to be the work of a later and mediocre writer.

Warning

The authenticity, date, and southern geographical identifications of the Periplus remain highly uncertain in this account.

Key Points

  • Reported Carthaginian Atlantic expedition
  • Traditional setting in fifth-century BC Carthage
  • Competing identifications of southern landmarks
  • Authenticity challenged as a Hellenistic forgery

Trust

average

This level indicates the accuracy of the dates, locations, and boundaries available in the current corpus.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 2: From c.500 BC to AD 1050

A starting point for further exploration—not an exhaustive bibliography.