ResourcesMap
CivilizationTrust high

100th century BCE – 10th century

Smithfield Industries

Interior southern Africa

Listen
Compare
View in the constellation

Smithfield Industries were a group of Later Stone Age assemblages traditionally associated with inland southern Africa, especially the Transvaal, Orange Free State, and northern Cape. They were generally regarded as macrolithic and usually lacked the backed implements characteristic of Wilton industries, although the category was poorly defined and included the ambiguous “Smithfield C.” Dated sequences show multiple phases, including late forms with abundant cylindrical wooden and bone arrow-points.

Territory · Civilization

Continue exploring

Ask Uriti

  • What defines the Smithfield Industries civilisation?
  • What happened for Smithfield Industries between 10 000 av. J.-C. and 1 000?
  • What is the link between Smithfield Industries and northern Cape?
  • About Smithfield Industries: can you clarify “Traditionally associated with inland regions”?

The Story

The inland Smithfield tradition

Smithfield was one of the two principal labels historically used to classify southern African Later Stone Age assemblages, alongside Wilton. The category was associated especially with inland regions such as the Transvaal, Orange Free State, and northern Cape, although related occurrences were also reported on the Natal and south Cape coasts. Its boundaries were never securely established from complete, dated, stratified assemblages.

Smithfield industries were generally regarded as macrolithic and, apart from the poorly defined “Smithfield C,” as lacking the backed implements characteristic of Wilton. The Transvaal sequence remains difficult to correlate with the better documented sequences farther south. At Heuningneskrans, Smithfield occupation spans the late twelfth to late sixth millennia BC, while a later Smithfield phase at the same broad regional scale is dated to the ninth through eleventh centuries AD.

The later assemblages were marked by a proliferation of cylindrical wooden and bone arrow-points. Comparable macrolithic material at Pietkloof was associated with pottery. The scarcity of reported microlithic aggregates in the Transvaal leaves open the possibility that the macrolithic Smithfield tradition continued through much of the span in which Wilton industries predominated in the Cape, but the chapter presents this as a possibility rather than a demonstrated sequence.

Warning

Smithfield was a historically influential but nebulous classification; the chapter stresses that its incomplete definition caused substantial confusion.

Key Points

  • Traditionally associated with inland regions
  • Generally macrolithic
  • Backed implements usually absent
  • Heuningneskrans sequence spans millennia
  • Later phases include arrow-points and pottery

Trust

high

This level indicates the accuracy of the dates, locations, and boundaries available in the current corpus.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 1: From the Earliest Times to c.500 BC

A starting point for further exploration—not an exhaustive bibliography.

ResourcesMap
CivilizationTrust high

100th century BCE – 10th century

Smithfield Industries

Interior southern Africa

Listen
Compare
View in the constellation

Smithfield Industries were a group of Later Stone Age assemblages traditionally associated with inland southern Africa, especially the Transvaal, Orange Free State, and northern Cape. They were generally regarded as macrolithic and usually lacked the backed implements characteristic of Wilton industries, although the category was poorly defined and included the ambiguous “Smithfield C.” Dated sequences show multiple phases, including late forms with abundant cylindrical wooden and bone arrow-points.

Territory · Civilization

Continue exploring

Ask Uriti

  • What defines the Smithfield Industries civilisation?
  • What happened for Smithfield Industries between 10 000 av. J.-C. and 1 000?
  • What is the link between Smithfield Industries and northern Cape?
  • About Smithfield Industries: can you clarify “Traditionally associated with inland regions”?

The Story

The inland Smithfield tradition

Smithfield was one of the two principal labels historically used to classify southern African Later Stone Age assemblages, alongside Wilton. The category was associated especially with inland regions such as the Transvaal, Orange Free State, and northern Cape, although related occurrences were also reported on the Natal and south Cape coasts. Its boundaries were never securely established from complete, dated, stratified assemblages.

Smithfield industries were generally regarded as macrolithic and, apart from the poorly defined “Smithfield C,” as lacking the backed implements characteristic of Wilton. The Transvaal sequence remains difficult to correlate with the better documented sequences farther south. At Heuningneskrans, Smithfield occupation spans the late twelfth to late sixth millennia BC, while a later Smithfield phase at the same broad regional scale is dated to the ninth through eleventh centuries AD.

The later assemblages were marked by a proliferation of cylindrical wooden and bone arrow-points. Comparable macrolithic material at Pietkloof was associated with pottery. The scarcity of reported microlithic aggregates in the Transvaal leaves open the possibility that the macrolithic Smithfield tradition continued through much of the span in which Wilton industries predominated in the Cape, but the chapter presents this as a possibility rather than a demonstrated sequence.

Warning

Smithfield was a historically influential but nebulous classification; the chapter stresses that its incomplete definition caused substantial confusion.

Key Points

  • Traditionally associated with inland regions
  • Generally macrolithic
  • Backed implements usually absent
  • Heuningneskrans sequence spans millennia
  • Later phases include arrow-points and pottery

Trust

high

This level indicates the accuracy of the dates, locations, and boundaries available in the current corpus.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 1: From the Earliest Times to c.500 BC

A starting point for further exploration—not an exhaustive bibliography.

Continue the journey

Related Paths

Other paths related to this story.

  • Oakhurst ComplexCivilization·100th century BCE — 80th century BCE