ResourcesMap
CityTrust average

100th century BCE

Sterkfontein

South Africa

Listen
Compare
View in the constellation

Sterkfontein is a South African fossil and archaeological locality where hominid teeth, a juvenile maxilla, and later a substantial cranium were recovered from successive cave infillings. The passage distinguishes an australopithecine-rich lower breccia from younger Members 4 and 5, separated by a substantial lapse of time. Stone artefacts occur abundantly in the younger deposits and broadly resemble the Developed Oldowan, while the hominid remains have been assigned variously to Australopithecus africanus and Homo.

Territory · City

Continue exploring

Ask Uriti

  • What place did Sterkfontein hold in its time?
  • What do we know about Sterkfontein from 10 000 av. J.-C. onward?
  • What is the link between Sterkfontein and Australopithecus africanus?
  • About Sterkfontein: can you clarify “South African cave fossil locality”?

The Story

Successive cave infillings at Sterkfontein

At Sterkfontein, excavations in 1957–58 recovered approximately half a dozen hominid teeth and a fragmentary juvenile maxilla from the western Extension area. The stratigraphic relationships and age of this part of the cave infilling became central to interpreting the fossils. The red-brown Middle Breccia was originally considered to overlie the lower australopithecine breccia unconformably, a distinction later expressed through the designation of Members 4 and 5.

The passage states that a substantial lapse of time probably separated the successive accumulations. Faunal differences, especially among bovids, indicated markedly different ages, but the younger assemblage could not be dated precisely. Estimates ranged from approximately 0.5 million years to approximately 1.0 million years, leaving the chronological position of the hominid fossils uncertain.

NJR ZA — Wikimedia Commons · wikimedia · CC BY-SA 3.0

Stone artefacts occur in substantial abundance only in this part of the Sterkfontein site, with many recovered in situ from the breccia. Their tool types broadly resemble the Developed Oldowan assemblages of Olduvai Gorge, although the proportions vary. The hominid remains were initially attributed to Australopithecus africanus, but the attribution was questioned after a cranium from the younger Member 5 showed cranio-facial and dental similarities to specimens assigned to Homo.

Key Points

  • South African cave fossil locality
  • Members 4 and 5 separated by substantial time
  • Developed Oldowan-like artefacts
  • Hominid attribution shifted between Australopithecus and Homo

Trust

average

This level indicates the accuracy of the dates, locations, and boundaries available in the current corpus.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 1: From the Earliest Times to c.500 BC

A starting point for further exploration—not an exhaustive bibliography.

ResourcesMap
CityTrust average

100th century BCE

Sterkfontein

South Africa

Listen
Compare
View in the constellation

Sterkfontein is a South African fossil and archaeological locality where hominid teeth, a juvenile maxilla, and later a substantial cranium were recovered from successive cave infillings. The passage distinguishes an australopithecine-rich lower breccia from younger Members 4 and 5, separated by a substantial lapse of time. Stone artefacts occur abundantly in the younger deposits and broadly resemble the Developed Oldowan, while the hominid remains have been assigned variously to Australopithecus africanus and Homo.

Territory · City

Continue exploring

Ask Uriti

  • What place did Sterkfontein hold in its time?
  • What do we know about Sterkfontein from 10 000 av. J.-C. onward?
  • What is the link between Sterkfontein and Australopithecus africanus?
  • About Sterkfontein: can you clarify “South African cave fossil locality”?

The Story

Successive cave infillings at Sterkfontein

At Sterkfontein, excavations in 1957–58 recovered approximately half a dozen hominid teeth and a fragmentary juvenile maxilla from the western Extension area. The stratigraphic relationships and age of this part of the cave infilling became central to interpreting the fossils. The red-brown Middle Breccia was originally considered to overlie the lower australopithecine breccia unconformably, a distinction later expressed through the designation of Members 4 and 5.

The passage states that a substantial lapse of time probably separated the successive accumulations. Faunal differences, especially among bovids, indicated markedly different ages, but the younger assemblage could not be dated precisely. Estimates ranged from approximately 0.5 million years to approximately 1.0 million years, leaving the chronological position of the hominid fossils uncertain.

NJR ZA — Wikimedia Commons · wikimedia · CC BY-SA 3.0

Stone artefacts occur in substantial abundance only in this part of the Sterkfontein site, with many recovered in situ from the breccia. Their tool types broadly resemble the Developed Oldowan assemblages of Olduvai Gorge, although the proportions vary. The hominid remains were initially attributed to Australopithecus africanus, but the attribution was questioned after a cranium from the younger Member 5 showed cranio-facial and dental similarities to specimens assigned to Homo.

Key Points

  • South African cave fossil locality
  • Members 4 and 5 separated by substantial time
  • Developed Oldowan-like artefacts
  • Hominid attribution shifted between Australopithecus and Homo

Trust

average

This level indicates the accuracy of the dates, locations, and boundaries available in the current corpus.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 1: From the Earliest Times to c.500 BC

A starting point for further exploration—not an exhaustive bibliography.

Continue the journey

Related Paths

Other paths related to this story.

  • Homo habilisCharacter·100th century BCE — 100th century BCE