RessourcesCarte
ÉvénementConfiance élevée

XIᵉ siècle – XIᵉ siècle

Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym Migration

From Upper Egypt through Barqa into Ifrikiya and the central Maghrib

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

The migration of the Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym was a major movement of nomadic Arab groups from Upper Egypt toward North Africa, encouraged by the Fatimids after the Zirid ruler rejected Fatimid authority and recognized the Abbasids. Beginning in 442/1050–1, the migration brought raids, political upheaval, and new nomadic principalities across Ifrikiya and the central Maghrib. Its longer-term effects included Arabization of the plains and changes in the balance between pastoral and settled societies.

Territoire · Événement

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Que s’est-il joué lors de Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym Migration ?
  • Quel rôle joue Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym Migration dans la région From Upper Egypt through Barqa into Ifrikiya and the central Maghrib ?
  • Quel lien entre Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym Migration et Kayrawān ?
  • À propos de Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym Migration : peux-tu préciser « Migration began in 1050–51 » ?

Le récit

A Fatimid reprisal and westward migration

The migration began after al-Muʿizz ibn Bādīs broke with the Fatimid suzerain in 439/1047 and recognized the Abbasid caliph. Because the Fatimids could not easily send an army against the Zirids, the vizier al-Yāzūrī advised directing the nomadic Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym from Upper Egypt toward Ifrikiya. The movement promised the tribal chiefs booty and better pastures.

The Arabs began moving west in 442/1050–1 and first ravaged Barqa. The Banū Hilāl continued toward southern Tunisia, while the Banū Sulaym remained in Barqa for several decades before moving onward. Al-Muʿizz initially attempted to use the newcomers as allies, but their raids soon devastated villages and towns. At Haydarān near Gabès in 443/1051–2, the Zirid army was decisively defeated.

The consequences extended beyond immediate warfare. In 449/1057 al-Muʿizz abandoned Kayrawān for al-Mahdiyya, and Kayrawān was sacked. The nomadic groups occupied broad parts of Ifrikiya and the central Maghrib, founding competing principalities and intensifying insecurity. Their arrival also altered the relationship between pastoral and agricultural populations, increasing pastureland at the expense of cultivated fields and contributing to the spread of Arabic rural dialects.

The scale and interpretation of the migration remain debated. Some modern historians have argued that the nomads were less numerous and less destructive than older accounts suggested, and that North African decline had begun before their arrival. Other explanations emphasize catastrophic famine and economic conditions in Egypt under al-Mustansir rather than a purely political Fatimid strategy. Even with these qualifications, the migration marked a major turning point in the social and linguistic history of the Maghrib.

Repères

  • Migration began in 1050–51
  • Barqa as the first North African zone
  • Zirid defeat at Haydarān
  • Kayrawān abandoned and sacked
  • Arabization of eastern Maghrib plains

Confiance

élevée

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

General history of Africa, III: Africa from the seventh to the eleventh century

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

RessourcesCarte
ÉvénementConfiance élevée

XIᵉ siècle – XIᵉ siècle

Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym Migration

From Upper Egypt through Barqa into Ifrikiya and the central Maghrib

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

The migration of the Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym was a major movement of nomadic Arab groups from Upper Egypt toward North Africa, encouraged by the Fatimids after the Zirid ruler rejected Fatimid authority and recognized the Abbasids. Beginning in 442/1050–1, the migration brought raids, political upheaval, and new nomadic principalities across Ifrikiya and the central Maghrib. Its longer-term effects included Arabization of the plains and changes in the balance between pastoral and settled societies.

Territoire · Événement

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Que s’est-il joué lors de Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym Migration ?
  • Quel rôle joue Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym Migration dans la région From Upper Egypt through Barqa into Ifrikiya and the central Maghrib ?
  • Quel lien entre Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym Migration et Kayrawān ?
  • À propos de Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym Migration : peux-tu préciser « Migration began in 1050–51 » ?

Le récit

A Fatimid reprisal and westward migration

The migration began after al-Muʿizz ibn Bādīs broke with the Fatimid suzerain in 439/1047 and recognized the Abbasid caliph. Because the Fatimids could not easily send an army against the Zirids, the vizier al-Yāzūrī advised directing the nomadic Banū Hilāl and Banū Sulaym from Upper Egypt toward Ifrikiya. The movement promised the tribal chiefs booty and better pastures.

The Arabs began moving west in 442/1050–1 and first ravaged Barqa. The Banū Hilāl continued toward southern Tunisia, while the Banū Sulaym remained in Barqa for several decades before moving onward. Al-Muʿizz initially attempted to use the newcomers as allies, but their raids soon devastated villages and towns. At Haydarān near Gabès in 443/1051–2, the Zirid army was decisively defeated.

The consequences extended beyond immediate warfare. In 449/1057 al-Muʿizz abandoned Kayrawān for al-Mahdiyya, and Kayrawān was sacked. The nomadic groups occupied broad parts of Ifrikiya and the central Maghrib, founding competing principalities and intensifying insecurity. Their arrival also altered the relationship between pastoral and agricultural populations, increasing pastureland at the expense of cultivated fields and contributing to the spread of Arabic rural dialects.

The scale and interpretation of the migration remain debated. Some modern historians have argued that the nomads were less numerous and less destructive than older accounts suggested, and that North African decline had begun before their arrival. Other explanations emphasize catastrophic famine and economic conditions in Egypt under al-Mustansir rather than a purely political Fatimid strategy. Even with these qualifications, the migration marked a major turning point in the social and linguistic history of the Maghrib.

Repères

  • Migration began in 1050–51
  • Barqa as the first North African zone
  • Zirid defeat at Haydarān
  • Kayrawān abandoned and sacked
  • Arabization of eastern Maghrib plains

Confiance

élevée

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

General history of Africa, III: Africa from the seventh to the eleventh century

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

Continuer le voyage

Chemins liés

D’autres chemins liés à cette histoire.

  • Fatimid CaliphateEmpire·Xᵉ siècle — XIIᵉ siècle
  • Hammadid DynastyRoyaume·XIᵉ siècle — XIIᵉ siècle
  • Zirid DynastyRoyaume·Xᵉ siècle — XIIᵉ siècle