RessourcesCarte
ÉvénementConfiance moyenne

IXᵉ siècle av. J.-C. – IIᵉ siècle av. J.-C.

Carthaginian Period

Maghrib

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

The Carthaginian period marks the phase in which the Maghrib entered recorded history through the arrival of Phoenician sailors and settlers on its coasts. Its reconstruction is constrained by the loss of Carthaginian literature, the hostile perspective of Greek and Roman narratives, and the limited archaeological visibility of settlements later covered by Roman towns. Indigenous Libyan cultures continued to evolve, while Phoenician influences became increasingly effective from about the fourth century.

Territoire · Événement

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Que s’est-il joué lors de Carthaginian Period ?
  • Quel rôle joue Carthaginian Period dans la région Maghrib ?
  • Quel lien entre Carthaginian Period et Medracen ?
  • À propos de Carthaginian Period : peux-tu préciser « Phoenician settlement opened recorded history » ?

Le récit

The Maghrib enters recorded history

The Carthaginian period begins in the excerpt with the arrival of Phoenician sailors and settlers on the coasts of the Maghrib. This development brought parts of North Africa into a historical record dominated by external observers. Greek and Roman writers often treated the western Phoenicians, especially Carthage, as enemies, making the surviving narrative evidence deeply hostile in tone.

The evidence is also incomplete in material and literary terms. No Carthaginian literature survived, while archaeology is constrained because many Phoenician settlements lie beneath more substantial Roman towns. Phoenician-language inscriptions exist in several forms, but most are tomb or votive texts that reveal little about the wider course of Carthaginian history. The resulting record is scattered and difficult to assemble.

Indigenous Libyan cultures did not disappear with Phoenician settlement. The Neolithic tradition associated with the Capsian culture continued into the first millennium before the common era, and the region did not develop a clearly separate Bronze Age. Phoenician influence increased from about the fourth century, while large stone-built surface tombs, including the tumulus of Mzora and the Medracen, may reflect the growth of larger tribal units in the fourth or third centuries.

Repères

  • Phoenician settlement opened recorded history
  • Greek and Roman sources dominate
  • Carthaginian literature is lost
  • Phoenician influence increased later
  • Indigenous cultures continued evolving

Confiance

moyenne

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

General history of Africa, II: Ancient civilizations of Africa

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

RessourcesCarte
ÉvénementConfiance moyenne

IXᵉ siècle av. J.-C. – IIᵉ siècle av. J.-C.

Carthaginian Period

Maghrib

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

The Carthaginian period marks the phase in which the Maghrib entered recorded history through the arrival of Phoenician sailors and settlers on its coasts. Its reconstruction is constrained by the loss of Carthaginian literature, the hostile perspective of Greek and Roman narratives, and the limited archaeological visibility of settlements later covered by Roman towns. Indigenous Libyan cultures continued to evolve, while Phoenician influences became increasingly effective from about the fourth century.

Territoire · Événement

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Que s’est-il joué lors de Carthaginian Period ?
  • Quel rôle joue Carthaginian Period dans la région Maghrib ?
  • Quel lien entre Carthaginian Period et Medracen ?
  • À propos de Carthaginian Period : peux-tu préciser « Phoenician settlement opened recorded history » ?

Le récit

The Maghrib enters recorded history

The Carthaginian period begins in the excerpt with the arrival of Phoenician sailors and settlers on the coasts of the Maghrib. This development brought parts of North Africa into a historical record dominated by external observers. Greek and Roman writers often treated the western Phoenicians, especially Carthage, as enemies, making the surviving narrative evidence deeply hostile in tone.

The evidence is also incomplete in material and literary terms. No Carthaginian literature survived, while archaeology is constrained because many Phoenician settlements lie beneath more substantial Roman towns. Phoenician-language inscriptions exist in several forms, but most are tomb or votive texts that reveal little about the wider course of Carthaginian history. The resulting record is scattered and difficult to assemble.

Indigenous Libyan cultures did not disappear with Phoenician settlement. The Neolithic tradition associated with the Capsian culture continued into the first millennium before the common era, and the region did not develop a clearly separate Bronze Age. Phoenician influence increased from about the fourth century, while large stone-built surface tombs, including the tumulus of Mzora and the Medracen, may reflect the growth of larger tribal units in the fourth or third centuries.

Repères

  • Phoenician settlement opened recorded history
  • Greek and Roman sources dominate
  • Carthaginian literature is lost
  • Phoenician influence increased later
  • Indigenous cultures continued evolving

Confiance

moyenne

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

General history of Africa, II: Ancient civilizations of Africa

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

Continuer le voyage

Chemins liés

D’autres chemins liés à cette histoire.

  • Proto-BerbersPeuple·Cᵉ siècle av. J.-C. — Iᵉʳ siècle av. J.-C.