RessourcesCarte
ÉvénementConfiance élevée

VIᵉ siècle av. J.-C.

Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC

Kush and the Nile Valley

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

The Egyptian invasion of Kush in 593 BC was conducted during the third year of King Psamtek II’s reign and reached Napata. Egyptian and foreign troops left graffiti at Abu Simbel and Buhen, while an inscription names Potasimto and Amasis as expedition leaders. The campaign may have damaged Napatan monuments and encouraged a later shift toward Meroe.

Territoire · Événement

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Que s’est-il joué lors de Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC ?
  • Quel rôle joue Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC dans la région Kush and the Nile Valley ?
  • Quel lien entre Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC et Potasimto ?
  • À propos de Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC : peux-tu préciser « Psamtek II invaded Kush in 593 BC » ?

Le récit

The Campaign of Psamtek II

In the third year of the Egyptian king Psamtek II, an Egyptian army invaded Kush and advanced as far as Napata. The campaign is also associated with Herodotus’s report that the Egyptians attacked Ethiopia at this time. The expedition therefore appears to have penetrated deeply into the Kushite heartland rather than remaining confined to the northern frontier.

Evidence for the campaign comes from inscriptions and graffiti at Abu Simbel and Buhen. The principal graffito at Abu Simbel names Potasimto as leader of the foreign troops and Amasis as leader of the Egyptian forces, and states that they advanced as far as Kerkis. Kerkis cannot be identified with certainty, although the passage notes a possible association with modern Kurgus upstream from Abu Hamed.

The invasion may have had serious consequences for Napata. Fragments of statues of Napatan rulers were discovered in the temples of Jebel Barkal, with the latest fragment attributed to Aspelta. These remains may indicate that Napata was sacked, but the evidence is presented cautiously and does not establish the event conclusively.

The campaign is also considered a possible reason for the growing importance of Meroe. Moving the main center of the state farther south would have increased military security, although the passage emphasizes that the change from Napata to Meroe was gradual and cannot be dated with certainty.

Repères

  • Psamtek II invaded Kush in 593 BC
  • The army reached Napata
  • Potasimto and Amasis led contingents
  • Graffiti record the expedition
  • The campaign may have weakened Napata

Confiance

élevée

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 2: From c.500 BC to AD 1050

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

RessourcesCarte
ÉvénementConfiance élevée

VIᵉ siècle av. J.-C.

Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC

Kush and the Nile Valley

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

The Egyptian invasion of Kush in 593 BC was conducted during the third year of King Psamtek II’s reign and reached Napata. Egyptian and foreign troops left graffiti at Abu Simbel and Buhen, while an inscription names Potasimto and Amasis as expedition leaders. The campaign may have damaged Napatan monuments and encouraged a later shift toward Meroe.

Territoire · Événement

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Que s’est-il joué lors de Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC ?
  • Quel rôle joue Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC dans la région Kush and the Nile Valley ?
  • Quel lien entre Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC et Potasimto ?
  • À propos de Egyptian Invasion of Kush in 593 BC : peux-tu préciser « Psamtek II invaded Kush in 593 BC » ?

Le récit

The Campaign of Psamtek II

In the third year of the Egyptian king Psamtek II, an Egyptian army invaded Kush and advanced as far as Napata. The campaign is also associated with Herodotus’s report that the Egyptians attacked Ethiopia at this time. The expedition therefore appears to have penetrated deeply into the Kushite heartland rather than remaining confined to the northern frontier.

Evidence for the campaign comes from inscriptions and graffiti at Abu Simbel and Buhen. The principal graffito at Abu Simbel names Potasimto as leader of the foreign troops and Amasis as leader of the Egyptian forces, and states that they advanced as far as Kerkis. Kerkis cannot be identified with certainty, although the passage notes a possible association with modern Kurgus upstream from Abu Hamed.

The invasion may have had serious consequences for Napata. Fragments of statues of Napatan rulers were discovered in the temples of Jebel Barkal, with the latest fragment attributed to Aspelta. These remains may indicate that Napata was sacked, but the evidence is presented cautiously and does not establish the event conclusively.

The campaign is also considered a possible reason for the growing importance of Meroe. Moving the main center of the state farther south would have increased military security, although the passage emphasizes that the change from Napata to Meroe was gradual and cannot be dated with certainty.

Repères

  • Psamtek II invaded Kush in 593 BC
  • The army reached Napata
  • Potasimto and Amasis led contingents
  • Graffiti record the expedition
  • The campaign may have weakened Napata

Confiance

élevée

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 2: From c.500 BC to AD 1050

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

Continuer le voyage

Chemins liés

D’autres chemins liés à cette histoire.

  • NapataVille·VIIIᵉ siècle av. J.-C. — IVᵉ siècle
  • Psamtek IIPersonnage·VIᵉ siècle av. J.-C. — VIᵉ siècle av. J.-C.