RessourcesCarte
ÉvénementConfiance élevée

XXᵉ siècle – XXᵉ siècle

Italian Colonial Development in Libya

Libya, especially Al-Djabal al-Akhdar, Tripoli, and Benghazi

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

Italian colonial development in Libya was a state-backed programme of agricultural settlement, industrial expansion, and infrastructure construction. It sought to resettle approximately 300,000 Italians, develop land and water resources, and build roads, railways, ports, communications systems, and public works. The programme also displaced Libyan communities, relied on coercive labour, and contributed to severe losses of livestock and economic resources.

Territoire · Événement

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Que s’est-il joué lors de Italian Colonial Development in Libya ?
  • Que s’est-il passé pour Italian Colonial Development in Libya entre 1 913 et 1 936 ?
  • Quel lien entre Italian Colonial Development in Libya et Tripoli ?
  • À propos de Italian Colonial Development in Libya : peux-tu préciser « Italian settlement targeted fertile Libyan lands » ?

Le récit

Settlement and economic planning

The Italian government launched an ambitious development scheme in Libya, concentrating particularly on Al-Djabal al-Akhdar, or the Green Mountain. Its stated demographic objective was to resettle about 300,000 Italians over twenty-five years. Public and semi-public institutions pooled resources to clear land, provide water, construct farm buildings, and supply settlers with livestock and equipment.

The settlement system placed the financial burden of development on agricultural production. Farmers were expected to transfer most of their produce to the institutions financing the project, with its value credited to their accounts. After a specified period, settlers could acquire ownership of their farms. By 1936, the project had cost about £800 million, while only 85,000 Italians had been resettled.

Industry and infrastructure

Italian authorities expanded existing small industries rather than creating a major industrial sector. Tripoli received a tuna-processing plant, a larger tobacco factory, and a shoe factory, while Benghazi received another shoe factory. Olive-oil processing, salt production, food processing, textiles, building materials, asphalt, gunpowder, fats, and soap all formed part of the colonial industrial economy.

Infrastructure received far greater investment. Between 1913 and 1936, expenditure on roads, railways, ports, communications, hydraulic works, and public buildings reached 870 million lire. The purpose was explicitly economic: to serve Italian interests, provide employment for Italian settlers, and create a market for Italian products.

Costs for Libyan society

Colonial development imposed severe costs on Libya’s population. The war and occupation caused deaths, imprisonment in concentration camps, and migration to neighbouring countries. Survivors of the camps were forced into semi-slave labour on the coastal road and agricultural projects, while the colonial aim was to push Libyans toward marginal interior lands and reserve fertile areas for Italian settlement.

The colonial economy also damaged pastoral resources. Sheep, goats, cattle, camels, horses, and donkeys were killed or confiscated, and surviving animals suffered starvation after being moved from pastoral areas to inhospitable zones near concentration camps. Between 1926 and 1933, the number of sheep fell from 800,000 to 98,000 and camels from 75,000 to 2,000.

Attention

Colonial infrastructure and settlement were accompanied by displacement, forced labour, livestock confiscation, and impoverishment of Libyan communities.

Repères

  • Italian settlement targeted fertile Libyan lands
  • Agricultural development relied on pooled institutions
  • Infrastructure investment served Italian economic interests
  • Colonial rule caused displacement and forced labour
  • Livestock numbers collapsed during occupation

Confiance

élevée

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

General history of Africa, VII: Africa under colonial domination, 1880-1935

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

RessourcesCarte
ÉvénementConfiance élevée

XXᵉ siècle – XXᵉ siècle

Italian Colonial Development in Libya

Libya, especially Al-Djabal al-Akhdar, Tripoli, and Benghazi

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

Italian colonial development in Libya was a state-backed programme of agricultural settlement, industrial expansion, and infrastructure construction. It sought to resettle approximately 300,000 Italians, develop land and water resources, and build roads, railways, ports, communications systems, and public works. The programme also displaced Libyan communities, relied on coercive labour, and contributed to severe losses of livestock and economic resources.

Territoire · Événement

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Que s’est-il joué lors de Italian Colonial Development in Libya ?
  • Que s’est-il passé pour Italian Colonial Development in Libya entre 1 913 et 1 936 ?
  • Quel lien entre Italian Colonial Development in Libya et Tripoli ?
  • À propos de Italian Colonial Development in Libya : peux-tu préciser « Italian settlement targeted fertile Libyan lands » ?

Le récit

Settlement and economic planning

The Italian government launched an ambitious development scheme in Libya, concentrating particularly on Al-Djabal al-Akhdar, or the Green Mountain. Its stated demographic objective was to resettle about 300,000 Italians over twenty-five years. Public and semi-public institutions pooled resources to clear land, provide water, construct farm buildings, and supply settlers with livestock and equipment.

The settlement system placed the financial burden of development on agricultural production. Farmers were expected to transfer most of their produce to the institutions financing the project, with its value credited to their accounts. After a specified period, settlers could acquire ownership of their farms. By 1936, the project had cost about £800 million, while only 85,000 Italians had been resettled.

Industry and infrastructure

Italian authorities expanded existing small industries rather than creating a major industrial sector. Tripoli received a tuna-processing plant, a larger tobacco factory, and a shoe factory, while Benghazi received another shoe factory. Olive-oil processing, salt production, food processing, textiles, building materials, asphalt, gunpowder, fats, and soap all formed part of the colonial industrial economy.

Infrastructure received far greater investment. Between 1913 and 1936, expenditure on roads, railways, ports, communications, hydraulic works, and public buildings reached 870 million lire. The purpose was explicitly economic: to serve Italian interests, provide employment for Italian settlers, and create a market for Italian products.

Costs for Libyan society

Colonial development imposed severe costs on Libya’s population. The war and occupation caused deaths, imprisonment in concentration camps, and migration to neighbouring countries. Survivors of the camps were forced into semi-slave labour on the coastal road and agricultural projects, while the colonial aim was to push Libyans toward marginal interior lands and reserve fertile areas for Italian settlement.

The colonial economy also damaged pastoral resources. Sheep, goats, cattle, camels, horses, and donkeys were killed or confiscated, and surviving animals suffered starvation after being moved from pastoral areas to inhospitable zones near concentration camps. Between 1926 and 1933, the number of sheep fell from 800,000 to 98,000 and camels from 75,000 to 2,000.

Attention

Colonial infrastructure and settlement were accompanied by displacement, forced labour, livestock confiscation, and impoverishment of Libyan communities.

Repères

  • Italian settlement targeted fertile Libyan lands
  • Agricultural development relied on pooled institutions
  • Infrastructure investment served Italian economic interests
  • Colonial rule caused displacement and forced labour
  • Livestock numbers collapsed during occupation

Confiance

élevée

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

General history of Africa, VII: Africa under colonial domination, 1880-1935

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.