RessourcesCarte
CivilisationConfiance moyenne

Xᵉ siècle – XIXᵉ siècle

Jonya System

Western Sudan and the Niger-Chad region

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

The jonya system was a form of captive incorporation found chiefly in Western Sudan and the Niger-Chad region. Unlike slaves treated as chattels, a jon belonged to a lineage and political category, retained rights over much of his production, and could participate in the ruling structure. The system operated in several West and Central African states, where royal captives could exercise authority and even own slaves. From the sixteenth century, Muslim emirates and slave-owning institutions progressively displaced jonya, although it survived among some traditional aristocracies until colonial conquest.

Territoire · Civilisation

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Qu’est-ce qui caractérise la civilisation Jonya System ?
  • Quel rôle joue Jonya System dans la région Western Sudan and the Niger-Chad region ?
  • Quel lien entre Jonya System et Mali ?
  • À propos de Jonya System : peux-tu préciser « Captive incorporation through lineage and political status » ?

Le récit

Captivity, lineage, and political belonging

The jonya system was rooted chiefly in Western Sudan and the Niger-Chad region. A jon, from the Mande word jon meaning “captive,” was not transferable as a commodity. He belonged to a lineage and occupied a recognized socio-political category, while retaining the bulk of what he produced. Captivity therefore existed within a social order that could incorporate dependants into productive and political relationships.

Jonya played a significant role in the states and empires of Ghana, Takrür, Mali, Känem-Borno, Asante, Yoruba, and Mutapa. Royal slaves could form part of the ruling class, exercise power, accumulate wealth, and own slaves themselves. These positions reveal a system in which captivity did not automatically mean the complete loss of social standing or legal personality.

From the sixteenth century onward, Muslim emirates and the spread of Muslim law progressively altered this arrangement. In much of Western Sudan, slave-owning systems replaced jonya, particularly where conquest and Islamization transformed landholding, taxation, and political authority. Nevertheless, jonya survived among traditional aristocracies in areas that experienced limited Muslim influence, including parts of the Wolof, Serer, Hausa, Kanëmbu, and Yoruba states.

Note

The extract distinguishes jonya from systems in which enslaved people were treated as fully transferable chattels.

Repères

  • Captive incorporation through lineage and political status
  • Royal slaves could exercise power and own slaves
  • Muslim emirates progressively displaced jonya
  • Survived in areas of limited Muslim influence

Confiance

moyenne

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

General history of Africa, V: Africa from the sixteenth to the eighteenth century

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

RessourcesCarte
CivilisationConfiance moyenne

Xᵉ siècle – XIXᵉ siècle

Jonya System

Western Sudan and the Niger-Chad region

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

The jonya system was a form of captive incorporation found chiefly in Western Sudan and the Niger-Chad region. Unlike slaves treated as chattels, a jon belonged to a lineage and political category, retained rights over much of his production, and could participate in the ruling structure. The system operated in several West and Central African states, where royal captives could exercise authority and even own slaves. From the sixteenth century, Muslim emirates and slave-owning institutions progressively displaced jonya, although it survived among some traditional aristocracies until colonial conquest.

Territoire · Civilisation

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Qu’est-ce qui caractérise la civilisation Jonya System ?
  • Quel rôle joue Jonya System dans la région Western Sudan and the Niger-Chad region ?
  • Quel lien entre Jonya System et Mali ?
  • À propos de Jonya System : peux-tu préciser « Captive incorporation through lineage and political status » ?

Le récit

Captivity, lineage, and political belonging

The jonya system was rooted chiefly in Western Sudan and the Niger-Chad region. A jon, from the Mande word jon meaning “captive,” was not transferable as a commodity. He belonged to a lineage and occupied a recognized socio-political category, while retaining the bulk of what he produced. Captivity therefore existed within a social order that could incorporate dependants into productive and political relationships.

Jonya played a significant role in the states and empires of Ghana, Takrür, Mali, Känem-Borno, Asante, Yoruba, and Mutapa. Royal slaves could form part of the ruling class, exercise power, accumulate wealth, and own slaves themselves. These positions reveal a system in which captivity did not automatically mean the complete loss of social standing or legal personality.

From the sixteenth century onward, Muslim emirates and the spread of Muslim law progressively altered this arrangement. In much of Western Sudan, slave-owning systems replaced jonya, particularly where conquest and Islamization transformed landholding, taxation, and political authority. Nevertheless, jonya survived among traditional aristocracies in areas that experienced limited Muslim influence, including parts of the Wolof, Serer, Hausa, Kanëmbu, and Yoruba states.

Note

The extract distinguishes jonya from systems in which enslaved people were treated as fully transferable chattels.

Repères

  • Captive incorporation through lineage and political status
  • Royal slaves could exercise power and own slaves
  • Muslim emirates progressively displaced jonya
  • Survived in areas of limited Muslim influence

Confiance

moyenne

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

General history of Africa, V: Africa from the sixteenth to the eighteenth century

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.