RessourcesCarte
ÉvénementConfiance moyenne

À partir de XXᵉ siècle

Katupha’s Law

Makhuwa phonology, Mozambique

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

Katupha’s Law is the name given to a Makhuwa deaspiration process that restricts the distribution of aspirated consonants within stems. In the analysis presented, multiple aspirates are reduced so that only the final aspirated consonant remains, with the process visible in causative formations and some reduplicated stems. Its regularity varies by dialect and morphological context.

Territoire · Événement

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Que s’est-il joué lors de Katupha’s Law ?
  • Que sait-on de Katupha’s Law à partir de 1 983 ?
  • Quel lien entre Katupha’s Law et Dahl’s Law ?
  • À propos de Katupha’s Law : peux-tu préciser « A Makhuwa stem is the relevant phonological domain » ?

Le récit

Katupha’s Law is proposed to account for recurring deaspiration patterns in Makhuwa. The process is defined within the stem, which includes the root together with derivational and inflectional suffixes, rather than merely within adjacent syllables. This domain explains why the addition of a causative extension can alter aspiration in an earlier part of the stem.

Causative formations provide the clearest evidence. Forms such as ottipha ‘to extinguish’ and ottipiha ‘to extinguish transitively’, or othuma ‘to buy’ and otumiha ‘to sell’, show loss of aspiration when the causative extension is added. Comparable alternations occur with verbs meaning ‘to leave’, ‘to frighten’, ‘to produce’, ‘to make arrive’, and ‘to break transitively’, although some dictionary forms preserve competing spellings.

Reduplication reveals both the reach and limits of the process. Some fully reduplicated stems retain more than one aspirated consonant, while other forms such as epwittipwitthi and nipattapattha show deaspiration. The analysis therefore treats Katupha’s Law as applying to all but the last aspirated consonant, while allowing that full reduplication, dialect differences, and non-adjacent consonants may weaken its enforcement.

Repères

  • A Makhuwa stem is the relevant phonological domain
  • Causative formation triggers systematic deaspiration
  • Reduplication shows variable application
  • The final aspirated consonant is preserved

Confiance

moyenne

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

Bantu Historical Linguistics

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

RessourcesCarte
ÉvénementConfiance moyenne

À partir de XXᵉ siècle

Katupha’s Law

Makhuwa phonology, Mozambique

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

Katupha’s Law is the name given to a Makhuwa deaspiration process that restricts the distribution of aspirated consonants within stems. In the analysis presented, multiple aspirates are reduced so that only the final aspirated consonant remains, with the process visible in causative formations and some reduplicated stems. Its regularity varies by dialect and morphological context.

Territoire · Événement

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Que s’est-il joué lors de Katupha’s Law ?
  • Que sait-on de Katupha’s Law à partir de 1 983 ?
  • Quel lien entre Katupha’s Law et Dahl’s Law ?
  • À propos de Katupha’s Law : peux-tu préciser « A Makhuwa stem is the relevant phonological domain » ?

Le récit

Katupha’s Law is proposed to account for recurring deaspiration patterns in Makhuwa. The process is defined within the stem, which includes the root together with derivational and inflectional suffixes, rather than merely within adjacent syllables. This domain explains why the addition of a causative extension can alter aspiration in an earlier part of the stem.

Causative formations provide the clearest evidence. Forms such as ottipha ‘to extinguish’ and ottipiha ‘to extinguish transitively’, or othuma ‘to buy’ and otumiha ‘to sell’, show loss of aspiration when the causative extension is added. Comparable alternations occur with verbs meaning ‘to leave’, ‘to frighten’, ‘to produce’, ‘to make arrive’, and ‘to break transitively’, although some dictionary forms preserve competing spellings.

Reduplication reveals both the reach and limits of the process. Some fully reduplicated stems retain more than one aspirated consonant, while other forms such as epwittipwitthi and nipattapattha show deaspiration. The analysis therefore treats Katupha’s Law as applying to all but the last aspirated consonant, while allowing that full reduplication, dialect differences, and non-adjacent consonants may weaken its enforcement.

Repères

  • A Makhuwa stem is the relevant phonological domain
  • Causative formation triggers systematic deaspiration
  • Reduplication shows variable application
  • The final aspirated consonant is preserved

Confiance

moyenne

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

Bantu Historical Linguistics

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

Continuer le voyage

Chemins liés

D’autres chemins liés à cette histoire.

  • MakhuwaPeuple·Iᵉʳ siècle av. J.-C. — Iᵉʳ siècle av. J.-C.