XXᵉ siècle – XXᵉ siècle
Sobat and White Nile regions, Sudan
Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible
Nuer resistance was a prolonged response to the expansion of British colonial authority in southern Sudan. The Nuer had previously managed their own affairs because earlier administrations exercised little effective control over them. They refused to recognize the new government’s supremacy, and leaders including Dengkur, Diu, and Dowl Diu organized or sustained opposition. Despite punitive measures, resistance intensified and culminated in a widespread Nuer revolt in 1927.
Poursuivre l’exploration
Le récit
Nuer resistance developed in the lands adjoining the Sobat River and the White Nile, where communities had long been accustomed to managing their own affairs. Earlier administrations had not exercised effective control over the Nuer, and the arrival of a more assertive colonial government threatened that autonomy. Refusal to recognize the supremacy of the new administration therefore became the foundation of continuing hostility.
Dengkur and Diu were identified as particularly active leaders of Nuer opposition. Their deaths in 1906 and 1907 did not end the movement. In 1914, another Nuer leader, Dowl Diu, attacked a government post, demonstrating that resistance remained capable of organized action after the loss of earlier leaders.
Colonial authorities responded with numerous indiscriminate punitive measures, but these failed to eliminate Nuer opposition. Instead, activism continued to gain momentum until the popular and widespread Nuer revolt of 1927. The sequence shows how resistance was sustained through local political leadership rather than through a single centralized state.
XXᵉ siècle – XXᵉ siècle
Sobat and White Nile regions, Sudan
Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible
Nuer resistance was a prolonged response to the expansion of British colonial authority in southern Sudan. The Nuer had previously managed their own affairs because earlier administrations exercised little effective control over them. They refused to recognize the new government’s supremacy, and leaders including Dengkur, Diu, and Dowl Diu organized or sustained opposition. Despite punitive measures, resistance intensified and culminated in a widespread Nuer revolt in 1927.
Poursuivre l’exploration
Le récit
Nuer resistance developed in the lands adjoining the Sobat River and the White Nile, where communities had long been accustomed to managing their own affairs. Earlier administrations had not exercised effective control over the Nuer, and the arrival of a more assertive colonial government threatened that autonomy. Refusal to recognize the supremacy of the new administration therefore became the foundation of continuing hostility.
Dengkur and Diu were identified as particularly active leaders of Nuer opposition. Their deaths in 1906 and 1907 did not end the movement. In 1914, another Nuer leader, Dowl Diu, attacked a government post, demonstrating that resistance remained capable of organized action after the loss of earlier leaders.
Colonial authorities responded with numerous indiscriminate punitive measures, but these failed to eliminate Nuer opposition. Instead, activism continued to gain momentum until the popular and widespread Nuer revolt of 1927. The sequence shows how resistance was sustained through local political leadership rather than through a single centralized state.