RessourcesCarte
VilleConfiance élevée

XIVᵉ siècle – XVᵉ siècle

Pate

Lamu archipelago, northern Kenya

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

Pate was a settlement in the Lamu archipelago whose local chronicle attributed an important role to it as early as the thirteenth century and claimed that it conquered the coast in the first half of the fourteenth century. Critical examination of the sources and archaeological evidence rejects those claims, placing Pate’s rise no earlier than the later fifteenth century and its major importance in the seventeenth century.

Territoire · Ville

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Quelle place occupait Pate dans son époque ?
  • Que s’est-il passé pour Pate entre 1 400 et 1 500 ?
  • Quel lien entre Pate et Lamu archipelago ?
  • À propos de Pate : peux-tu préciser « Local chronicle claims early coastal conquest » ?

Le récit

Chronicle claims and historical criticism

Pate occupies a prominent place in the histories of the Lamu archipelago, but the passage treats its traditional narrative with caution. According to the town’s chronicle, Pate became important as early as the thirteenth century and conquered the entire coast, including Kilwa, during the first half of the fourteenth century. These claims would make Pate an unusually powerful early coastal polity.

A critical examination of the written sources, combined with archaeological evidence, has concluded that this part of the chronicle lacks historical foundation. Pate does not appear to have been a place of consequence before the latter part of the fifteenth century. The contrast between the chronicle’s claims and the archaeological assessment makes Pate a useful example of the need to test dynastic traditions against material evidence.

The excerpt places Pate’s major importance much later, in the seventeenth century. Within the period discussed here, it should therefore be understood as a settlement whose later prominence was projected backward by its local historical tradition. Its location in the Lamu archipelago nevertheless places it within the northern Swahili urban world.

Attention

The claimed early conquest of the coast by Pate is explicitly rejected as historically unfounded.

Repères

  • Local chronicle claims early coastal conquest
  • Archaeology rejects the early imperial narrative
  • Pate gained consequence only in the late fifteenth century
  • Major importance came in the seventeenth century

Confiance

élevée

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 3: From c.1050 to c.1600

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

RessourcesCarte
VilleConfiance élevée

XIVᵉ siècle – XVᵉ siècle

Pate

Lamu archipelago, northern Kenya

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

Pate was a settlement in the Lamu archipelago whose local chronicle attributed an important role to it as early as the thirteenth century and claimed that it conquered the coast in the first half of the fourteenth century. Critical examination of the sources and archaeological evidence rejects those claims, placing Pate’s rise no earlier than the later fifteenth century and its major importance in the seventeenth century.

Territoire · Ville

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Quelle place occupait Pate dans son époque ?
  • Que s’est-il passé pour Pate entre 1 400 et 1 500 ?
  • Quel lien entre Pate et Lamu archipelago ?
  • À propos de Pate : peux-tu préciser « Local chronicle claims early coastal conquest » ?

Le récit

Chronicle claims and historical criticism

Pate occupies a prominent place in the histories of the Lamu archipelago, but the passage treats its traditional narrative with caution. According to the town’s chronicle, Pate became important as early as the thirteenth century and conquered the entire coast, including Kilwa, during the first half of the fourteenth century. These claims would make Pate an unusually powerful early coastal polity.

A critical examination of the written sources, combined with archaeological evidence, has concluded that this part of the chronicle lacks historical foundation. Pate does not appear to have been a place of consequence before the latter part of the fifteenth century. The contrast between the chronicle’s claims and the archaeological assessment makes Pate a useful example of the need to test dynastic traditions against material evidence.

The excerpt places Pate’s major importance much later, in the seventeenth century. Within the period discussed here, it should therefore be understood as a settlement whose later prominence was projected backward by its local historical tradition. Its location in the Lamu archipelago nevertheless places it within the northern Swahili urban world.

Attention

The claimed early conquest of the coast by Pate is explicitly rejected as historically unfounded.

Repères

  • Local chronicle claims early coastal conquest
  • Archaeology rejects the early imperial narrative
  • Pate gained consequence only in the late fifteenth century
  • Major importance came in the seventeenth century

Confiance

élevée

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 3: From c.1050 to c.1600

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

Continuer le voyage

Chemins liés

D’autres chemins liés à cette histoire.

  • KilwaVille·VIIIᵉ siècle — XVᵉ siècle
  • LamuVille·XIVᵉ siècle — XVᵉ siècle