RessourcesCarte
CivilisationConfiance moyenne

À partir de XXᵉ siècle

Social Stratification in Post-Colonial African States

Africa

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

A comparative social formation in which colonial and post-colonial institutions superimposed educational and bureaucratic status criteria upon older structures based on kinship, lineage, age, and sex. The resulting hierarchy included upper and middle classes, a proletariat, peasants, and a growing unemployed youth population. Formal education became a principal avenue of upward mobility, while restricted access to higher education and urban employment reinforced an “elite-mass” divide.

Territoire · Civilisation

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Qu’est-ce qui caractérise la civilisation Social Stratification in Post-Colonial African States ?
  • Que sait-on de Social Stratification in Post-Colonial African States à partir de 1 950 ?
  • Quel lien entre Social Stratification in Post-Colonial African States et Proletariat ?
  • À propos de Social Stratification in Post-Colonial African States : peux-tu préciser « Education became a route to upward mobility » ?

Le récit

A layered social order

In the independent African states described here, colonial rule had left a new stratificational pattern superimposed upon traditional social structures. Earlier status distinctions had been associated with kinship, lineage, age, and sex, whereas bureaucratic roles introduced formal education as a new criterion of differentiation. Education rapidly became a passport to upward mobility, but the strata formed around it tended to harden rather than dissolve social divisions.

The model distinguishes five broad levels. The upper class, approximately one percent of the population, combined a bureaucratic-professional segment—including senior officials, military officers, lawyers, doctors, managers, and university teachers—with a commercial segment of large export farmers and major merchants. Below it stood a middle class of bureaucratic cadres, junior military personnel, teachers, and a petite bourgeoisie of small traders, usually self-employed and possessing little capital.

The working class or proletariat comprised skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled labourers and represented between five and eight percent of the population. Peasants, described as subsistence farmers, formed roughly 70 to 80 percent and were often illiterate, cultivating very small plots. A fifth stratum consisted of unemployed or unemployable primary-school leavers and drop-outs, whose growth after independence was linked to educational expansion and the limited capacity of the administrative state to provide suitable employment.

Note

The five-level model is explicitly presented as generalised and paradigmatic, not as a faithful description of every African state.

Repères

  • Education became a route to upward mobility
  • The upper class represented approximately one percent
  • Peasants formed roughly 70 to 80 percent
  • Unemployed youth became a sociopolitical threat
  • The model remained comparative and paradigmatic

Confiance

moyenne

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 8: From c.1940 to c.1975

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.

RessourcesCarte
CivilisationConfiance moyenne

À partir de XXᵉ siècle

Social Stratification in Post-Colonial African States

Africa

Écouter
Comparer
Voir dans la constellation

Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible

Se connecter

A comparative social formation in which colonial and post-colonial institutions superimposed educational and bureaucratic status criteria upon older structures based on kinship, lineage, age, and sex. The resulting hierarchy included upper and middle classes, a proletariat, peasants, and a growing unemployed youth population. Formal education became a principal avenue of upward mobility, while restricted access to higher education and urban employment reinforced an “elite-mass” divide.

Territoire · Civilisation

Poursuivre l’exploration

Demander à Uriti

  • Qu’est-ce qui caractérise la civilisation Social Stratification in Post-Colonial African States ?
  • Que sait-on de Social Stratification in Post-Colonial African States à partir de 1 950 ?
  • Quel lien entre Social Stratification in Post-Colonial African States et Proletariat ?
  • À propos de Social Stratification in Post-Colonial African States : peux-tu préciser « Education became a route to upward mobility » ?

Le récit

A layered social order

In the independent African states described here, colonial rule had left a new stratificational pattern superimposed upon traditional social structures. Earlier status distinctions had been associated with kinship, lineage, age, and sex, whereas bureaucratic roles introduced formal education as a new criterion of differentiation. Education rapidly became a passport to upward mobility, but the strata formed around it tended to harden rather than dissolve social divisions.

The model distinguishes five broad levels. The upper class, approximately one percent of the population, combined a bureaucratic-professional segment—including senior officials, military officers, lawyers, doctors, managers, and university teachers—with a commercial segment of large export farmers and major merchants. Below it stood a middle class of bureaucratic cadres, junior military personnel, teachers, and a petite bourgeoisie of small traders, usually self-employed and possessing little capital.

The working class or proletariat comprised skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled labourers and represented between five and eight percent of the population. Peasants, described as subsistence farmers, formed roughly 70 to 80 percent and were often illiterate, cultivating very small plots. A fifth stratum consisted of unemployed or unemployable primary-school leavers and drop-outs, whose growth after independence was linked to educational expansion and the limited capacity of the administrative state to provide suitable employment.

Note

The five-level model is explicitly presented as generalised and paradigmatic, not as a faithful description of every African state.

Repères

  • Education became a route to upward mobility
  • The upper class represented approximately one percent
  • Peasants formed roughly 70 to 80 percent
  • Unemployed youth became a sociopolitical threat
  • The model remained comparative and paradigmatic

Confiance

moyenne

Ce niveau qualifie la précision des dates, localisations et limites disponibles dans le corpus actuel.

Source

The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 8: From c.1940 to c.1975

Point de départ pour aller plus loin — pas une bibliographie exhaustive.