IXᵉ siècle av. J.-C. – IIᵉ siècle av. J.-C.
Central Mediterranean Sahara corridor
Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible
Carthaginian contacts with Saharan peoples and regions farther south are presented as obscure and archaeologically difficult to trace. The likely coastal gateways were Leptis Magna and Sabratha, from which communication could proceed toward the Garamantes and Garama. Possible exchanges included slaves, ivory, skins, and perhaps gold, but the evidence is limited and the absence of camels made sustained large-scale trans-Saharan trade difficult.
Poursuivre l’exploration
Le récit
The scale of Carthaginian contact with the Sahara remains uncertain. If communication existed, the most plausible coastal approaches ran through Leptis Magna and Sabratha, where natural obstacles were fewer than elsewhere along the coast. Carthaginian efforts to exclude Greek involvement have sometimes been interpreted as evidence that the interior possessed commercial importance, although the excerpt stresses that direct proof is lacking.
Herodotus knew of the Garamantes and Nasamones south of the Syrtic Gulf and described a journey of thirty days from the coast to the territory associated with the Garamantes, probably the population centred on Garama, or Germa. A later story claimed that a Carthaginian named Mago crossed the desert three times. Archaeology has not identified a clear commercial record for this exchange; literary references mention carbuncles, while slaves, ivory, skins, and Sudanese gold remain proposed or problematic commodities.
Evidence from Germa indicates population growth beginning in the fifth or fourth century BCE, followed by the development of a substantial sedentary agricultural population. This may reflect cultural influences from coastal Carthaginian sites, but the connection is not established as certain. The absence of camels in North Africa during this period helps explain why travel across the Sahara was difficult and irregular, and why integration of the Sahara into a wider trans-Saharan cultural environment is dated only to the early Arab period.
IXᵉ siècle av. J.-C. – IIᵉ siècle av. J.-C.
Central Mediterranean Sahara corridor
Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible
Carthaginian contacts with Saharan peoples and regions farther south are presented as obscure and archaeologically difficult to trace. The likely coastal gateways were Leptis Magna and Sabratha, from which communication could proceed toward the Garamantes and Garama. Possible exchanges included slaves, ivory, skins, and perhaps gold, but the evidence is limited and the absence of camels made sustained large-scale trans-Saharan trade difficult.
Poursuivre l’exploration
Le récit
The scale of Carthaginian contact with the Sahara remains uncertain. If communication existed, the most plausible coastal approaches ran through Leptis Magna and Sabratha, where natural obstacles were fewer than elsewhere along the coast. Carthaginian efforts to exclude Greek involvement have sometimes been interpreted as evidence that the interior possessed commercial importance, although the excerpt stresses that direct proof is lacking.
Herodotus knew of the Garamantes and Nasamones south of the Syrtic Gulf and described a journey of thirty days from the coast to the territory associated with the Garamantes, probably the population centred on Garama, or Germa. A later story claimed that a Carthaginian named Mago crossed the desert three times. Archaeology has not identified a clear commercial record for this exchange; literary references mention carbuncles, while slaves, ivory, skins, and Sudanese gold remain proposed or problematic commodities.
Evidence from Germa indicates population growth beginning in the fifth or fourth century BCE, followed by the development of a substantial sedentary agricultural population. This may reflect cultural influences from coastal Carthaginian sites, but the connection is not established as certain. The absence of camels in North Africa during this period helps explain why travel across the Sahara was difficult and irregular, and why integration of the Sahara into a wider trans-Saharan cultural environment is dated only to the early Arab period.
Continuer le voyage
D’autres chemins liés à cette histoire.