À partir de XVIIIᵉ siècle
Walvis Bay and adjoining Namibian coast
Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible
Trade between pastoral communities around Walvis Bay and visiting European vessels intensified from the mid-eighteenth century. Pastoralists exchanged beef for glass beads, porcelain, and other imported goods, later including liquor and firearms. The exchange was selective and unequal: local communities preferred goods that fit existing exchange systems, while control of livestock and trade opportunities contributed to economic differentiation and marginalization.
Poursuivre l’exploration
Le récit
Pastoral communities in the !Khuiseb Delta established regular trading contacts with European vessels calling at Walvis Bay from the mid-eighteenth century. Beef was in considerable demand among visiting ships and was exchanged for glass trade beads, porcelain, and other goods. Later exchanges also included liquor and firearms, linking the coastal pastoral economy to wider maritime commerce.
The trade reshaped settlement and livestock management around the bay. More permanent pastoral encampments were maintained in the dune fields immediately inland, while the focus of settlement shifted northward and closer to the anchorage in order to control trading contact. Cattle and other stock were kept farther inland near pasture and water, requiring traders to wait several days for animals to be brought down to the bay.
Archaeological evidence reveals both the movement of people and the material selectivity of the exchange. One site preserves hoof impressions of cattle and small stock, together with tracks of adults, children, and dogs crossing the lagoon mudflats. Recovered glass beads were fewer in type than the range available to Europeans, while annular porcelain bowls were favoured over flat plates and ornamental goods that had no equivalent in indigenous exchange practices.
The relationship was not an exchange between equals. Wealth in trade goods was unevenly distributed, and people who had lost their livestock could become dependent on handouts or missionary charity. At Walvis Bay, the source associates this process with distinctions between the !Khuisenin, who kept livestock, and the Hurinîn, who relied on fish, mussels, and coastal resources.
À partir de XVIIIᵉ siècle
Walvis Bay and adjoining Namibian coast
Traduction non disponible · Original (anglais) · français indisponible
Trade between pastoral communities around Walvis Bay and visiting European vessels intensified from the mid-eighteenth century. Pastoralists exchanged beef for glass beads, porcelain, and other imported goods, later including liquor and firearms. The exchange was selective and unequal: local communities preferred goods that fit existing exchange systems, while control of livestock and trade opportunities contributed to economic differentiation and marginalization.
Poursuivre l’exploration
Le récit
Pastoral communities in the !Khuiseb Delta established regular trading contacts with European vessels calling at Walvis Bay from the mid-eighteenth century. Beef was in considerable demand among visiting ships and was exchanged for glass trade beads, porcelain, and other goods. Later exchanges also included liquor and firearms, linking the coastal pastoral economy to wider maritime commerce.
The trade reshaped settlement and livestock management around the bay. More permanent pastoral encampments were maintained in the dune fields immediately inland, while the focus of settlement shifted northward and closer to the anchorage in order to control trading contact. Cattle and other stock were kept farther inland near pasture and water, requiring traders to wait several days for animals to be brought down to the bay.
Archaeological evidence reveals both the movement of people and the material selectivity of the exchange. One site preserves hoof impressions of cattle and small stock, together with tracks of adults, children, and dogs crossing the lagoon mudflats. Recovered glass beads were fewer in type than the range available to Europeans, while annular porcelain bowls were favoured over flat plates and ornamental goods that had no equivalent in indigenous exchange practices.
The relationship was not an exchange between equals. Wealth in trade goods was unevenly distributed, and people who had lost their livestock could become dependent on handouts or missionary charity. At Walvis Bay, the source associates this process with distinctions between the !Khuisenin, who kept livestock, and the Hurinîn, who relied on fish, mussels, and coastal resources.
Continuer le voyage
D’autres chemins liés à cette histoire.